Phil King wrote:
OK I might not be in quite the same boat as working class Sheffielders (which I assume you might be) but I've still had to subscribe to the hard-working ethics of Mrs.T's legacy. Say Mrs. Thatcher benefitted 70% of the population at the expense of the 30%? In which case it wouldn't be unreasonable for a lot of people to have thought she'd given them a fair crack (and this doesn't neccessarily preclude the working class).
Well no, I'm not from Sheffield but from the same 'place'. And I think you have it right actually - to the 'expense' of the 30%, which would be OK if everyone had the slightest of opportunities to take a part in the new prosperity, but Thatch knew full well there would be economic 'collateral damage' but thought the 'short sharp shock' would be appreciated by all.
Wrong. As you can see, it left a deep impression on a generation. We're not being trendy with our Thatch-bashing - she is polarising. If you're lucky enough to be one of the people who benefitted, all is good and rosy. But if you're one of those left shell-shocked by having the rug pulled from under your feet in one generation, then you aren't going to be persuaded. I guess you had to be 'there' - or, 'here' to know what that's about.
Watching my mum work herself into the ground (self employed and all) only to have poll tax thrown at her, ultimately meaning I had to leave home at 18, was probably the biggest insult to someone who was the kind of Brit that Thatch supposedly championed.
What a con.