Oh I'm in a mischevious devils advocate mood...
Maggie -
There's an argument that could be made that Motown mostly made a lot of sanitised soul music, it stripped it of all its preoccupations with sex, religion, & social issues to make it more palatable for a cross racial audience and therefore made soul music, in some people's eyes, a blander version. Not all of it was obviously, there's an occasional What's Going On for one - which incidentally Berry Gordy didn't want to put out *because* it was too political and called it the worst record he'd ever heard.
I don't think that matters at all personally, it's the tunes at the end of the day that count, but again there's a similarity there when Cowell etc get accused of making bland music. I'm *not* defending him or the music he and his ilk put out, just pointing out parallels. Xenomania are the current Holland, Dozier, Holland etc etc. Time is the ultimate judge of quality, nothing else.
As for milking, have a listen to Martha Reeves & Vandellas's Heatwave, Live Wire, & Quicksand. They're all the same song..!
Subjective opinion who can sing, a *lot* of people love that Mariah Carey warbling bollocks. We just don't.
You liked SAW back in the day when you were younger, you weren't "wrong" to like them if you did - there's some stuff I used to love when I was a kid that makes my ears bleed now but I loved it at the time. Who's to say that anyone getting enjoyment out of something like that is any less worthwhile than someone getting enjoyment out of "proper" music? A snob, for want of a kinder word, says that, that's who.
Don't get me wrong, 99% of the time ( I reserve that 1% for the occasional guilty pleasure) *I'm* the worst musical snob you could meet and I loathe the preoccupation with X Factor, the music that comes out of it, and the music industry's short sightedness. I just do my best to ignore it and acknowledge that it's music that's not made for me/us, it's made for an audience that's *always* been around and always will be, ie: one that likes crap